首页> 外文OA文献 >Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review
【2h】

Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing lumbar spinal pathology in adult patients with low back pain or sciatica: a diagnostic systematic review

机译:磁共振成像用于诊断腰痛或坐骨神经痛的成年患者的腰椎病理:系统的诊断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose In about 5% of all cases LBP is associated with serious underlying pathology requiring diagnostic confirmation and directed treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used for this diagnostic purpose yet its role remains controversial. Consequently, this review aimed to summarize the available evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for identifying lumbar spinal pathology in adult low back pain (LPB) or sciatica patients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched (until December 2009) for observational studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI compared to a reference test for the identification of lumbar spinal pathology. Two reviewers independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Pooled summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for homogenous subsets of studies. Results Eight studies were included in this review. Strata were defined for separate pathologies i.e. lumbar disc herniation (HNP) and spinal stenosis. Five studies comparing MRI to findings at the surgery for identifying HNP were included in a meta-analysis. Pooled analysis resulted in a summary estimate of sensitivity of 75% (95% CI 65-83%) and specificity of 77% (95% CI 61-88%). For spinal stenosis pooling was not possible. Conclusions The results suggest that a considerable proportion of patients may be classified incorrectly by MRI for HNP and spinal stenosis. However, the evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of MRI found by this review is not conclusive, since the results could be distorted due to the limited number of studies and large heterogeneity. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.
机译:目的在所有病例中,约有5%的LBP与严重的潜在病理相关,需要诊断确认和定向治疗。磁共振成像(MRI)通常用于此诊断目的,但其作用仍存在争议。因此,本综述旨在总结关于MRI诊断成人下腰痛(LPB)或坐骨神经痛患者的腰椎病理学诊断准确性的现有证据。方法(2009年12月之前)对MEDLINE,EMBASE和CINAHL进行搜索,以进行观察性研究,以评估MRI的诊断准确性,并与用于鉴定腰椎病理的参考测试进行比较。两名审稿人独立选择纳入研究,提取数据并评估方法学质量。对于研究的同质子集,以95%置信区间汇总了敏感性和特异性的汇总汇总估计。结果本评价纳入八项研究。为不同的病理学定义了分层,即腰椎间盘突出症(HNP)和椎管狭窄。荟萃分析包括五项将MRI与手术中发现HNP的发现进行比较的研究。汇总分析得出的敏感性汇总估计为75%(95%CI 65-83%),特异性为77%(95%CI 61-88%)。对于椎管狭窄,不可能合并。结论结果表明,MRI对HNP和椎管狭窄的诊断可能对相当多的患者进行了错误分类。但是,该综述发现的MRI诊断准确性的证据尚无定论,因为由于研究数量有限和异质性较大,结果可能会失真。 ©2011年Springer-Verlag。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号